Shirley Sherrod
Shirley Sherrod has fallen off the radar. NOW we know why:
(thanks to Dave R. for the tip)
Everyone who felt pity for Shirley Sherrod being dealt a bad hand, think
again...
This story doesn't seem to have made the media - yet!
Andrew Breitbart is a media genius.
He proved it originally with his brilliant handling of the ACORN 'hooker'
scandal which he skillfully manipulated so that the corrupt media was
forced, against its will, to broadcast corruption in one of Obama's most
powerful political support groups. But Breitbart's handing of that affair
is nothing compared to his brilliant manipulation of the Shirley Sherrod
'white farmer' scandal.
It all began last Monday, July 22, 2010. As the country watched in horror,
Breitbart released a snippet of a tape on his "Big Government" site which
showed an obscure black female official of the Dept. of Agriculture laughing
to a roomful of NAACP members about how she'd discriminated against a
destitute white farmer and refused to give him the financial aid he
desperately needed. As she smirked to the room, she'd sent him instead to a
white lawyer - 'one of his own kind' - for help. The black woman was
Shirley Sherrod - and almost immediately she became the center of a
firestorm of controversy which exploded throughout the country. Within a
day of the release of that infamous tape, the head of the Dept. of
Agriculture, spurred on by Obama, demanded - and received - Sherrod's
resignation. Breitbart had won.
But then seemingly Breitbart's actions began to explode in his face. As
Sherrod screamed in protest, FOX News released the entire text of her speech
last March to the NAACP. And there on tape Sherrod was shown supposedly
repenting of her racism against a white farmer and instead championing his
fight to win funds to keep his farm afloat. Within hours of that entire
tape being revealed, the entire world turned against Andrew Breitbart.
Conservatives throughout the country were enraged that he'd endangered their
reputations by releasing a 'doctored' tape. Breitbart, they thundered, had
dealt a fatal blow to the conservative media. I confess that I also was
horrified at what I saw as the clumsiness and stupidity of Breitbart in
'doctoring' a tape to make a supposedly innocent woman look guilty. But now
I discover I have been as guilty of haste to judgment of Breitbart as the
Dept. of Agriculture was of Ms. Sherrod.
Only now am I realizing the real purpose for Breitbart's release of that
tape snippet. It was to allow him to cunningly trick the media into
exposing one of the most shocking examples of corruption in the federal
government - a little known legal case called "Pigford v. Glickman".
(Read about it here.)
"In 1997, 400 African-American farmers sued the United States Department of
Agriculture, alleging that they had been unfairly denied USDA loans due to
racial discrimination during the period 1983 to 1997." The case was
entitled "Pigford v. Glickman" and in 1999, the black farmers won their
case. The government agreed to pay each of them as much as $50,000 to
settle their claims.
But then on February 23 of this year, something shocking happened in
relation to that original judgment. In total silence, the USDA agreed to
release more funds to "Pigford". The amount was a staggering $1.25 billion.
This was because the original number of plaintiffs - 400 black farmers - had
now swollen in a class action suit to include a total of 86,000 black
farmers throughout America.
There was only one teensy problem. The United States of America doesn't
have 86,000 black farmers. According to accurate and totally verified
census data, the total number of black farmers throughout America is only
39,697. Oops.
Well, gosh - how on earth did 39,697 explode into 86,000 claims? And how
did $50,000 explode into $1.25 billion? Well, folks, you'll just have to
ask the woman who not only spearheaded this case because of her position in
1997 at the "Rural Development Leadership Network" but whose family received
the highest single payout (approximately $13 million) from that action -
Shirley Sherrod.
<http://beforeitsnews.com/story/110/024/Is_There_More_to_Sherrods_Dismissal.
html> Oops again.
Yes, folks. It appears that Ms. Sherrod had just unwittingly exposed
herself as the perpetrator of one of the biggest fraud claims in the United
States - a fraud enabled solely because she screamed racism at the
government and cowed them into submission. And it gets even more
interesting. Ms. Sherrod has also exposed the person who aided and abetted
her in this race fraud. As it turns out, the original judgment of "Pigford
v. Glickman" in 1999 only applied to a total of 16,000 black farmers. But
in 2008, a junior Senator got a law passed to reopen the case and allow more
black farmers to sue for funds. The Senator was Barack Obama.
Because this law was passed in dead silence and because the woman
responsible for spearheading it was an obscure USDA official, American
taxpayers did not realize that they had just been forced in the midst of a
worldwide depression to pay out more than $1.25 billion to settle a race
claim.
But Breitbart knew. And last Monday, July 22, 2010, he cleverly laid a trap
which Sherrod - and Obama - stumbled headfirst into which has now resulted
in the entire world discovering the existence of this corrupt financial
judgment. Yes, folks - Breitbart is a genius.
As for Ms. Sherrod? Well, she's discovered too late that her cry of 'racism'
to the media which was intended to throw the spotlight on Breitbart has
instead thrown that spotlight on herself - and her corruption. Sherrod has
vanished from public view. Her 'pigs', it seems, have come home to roost.
Oink!
(thanks to Dave R. for the tip)
Everyone who felt pity for Shirley Sherrod being dealt a bad hand, think
again...
This story doesn't seem to have made the media - yet!
Andrew Breitbart is a media genius.
He proved it originally with his brilliant handling of the ACORN 'hooker'
scandal which he skillfully manipulated so that the corrupt media was
forced, against its will, to broadcast corruption in one of Obama's most
powerful political support groups. But Breitbart's handing of that affair
is nothing compared to his brilliant manipulation of the Shirley Sherrod
'white farmer' scandal.
It all began last Monday, July 22, 2010. As the country watched in horror,
Breitbart released a snippet of a tape on his "Big Government" site which
showed an obscure black female official of the Dept. of Agriculture laughing
to a roomful of NAACP members about how she'd discriminated against a
destitute white farmer and refused to give him the financial aid he
desperately needed. As she smirked to the room, she'd sent him instead to a
white lawyer - 'one of his own kind' - for help. The black woman was
Shirley Sherrod - and almost immediately she became the center of a
firestorm of controversy which exploded throughout the country. Within a
day of the release of that infamous tape, the head of the Dept. of
Agriculture, spurred on by Obama, demanded - and received - Sherrod's
resignation. Breitbart had won.
But then seemingly Breitbart's actions began to explode in his face. As
Sherrod screamed in protest, FOX News released the entire text of her speech
last March to the NAACP. And there on tape Sherrod was shown supposedly
repenting of her racism against a white farmer and instead championing his
fight to win funds to keep his farm afloat. Within hours of that entire
tape being revealed, the entire world turned against Andrew Breitbart.
Conservatives throughout the country were enraged that he'd endangered their
reputations by releasing a 'doctored' tape. Breitbart, they thundered, had
dealt a fatal blow to the conservative media. I confess that I also was
horrified at what I saw as the clumsiness and stupidity of Breitbart in
'doctoring' a tape to make a supposedly innocent woman look guilty. But now
I discover I have been as guilty of haste to judgment of Breitbart as the
Dept. of Agriculture was of Ms. Sherrod.
Only now am I realizing the real purpose for Breitbart's release of that
tape snippet. It was to allow him to cunningly trick the media into
exposing one of the most shocking examples of corruption in the federal
government - a little known legal case called "Pigford v. Glickman".
(Read about it here.)
"In 1997, 400 African-American farmers sued the United States Department of
Agriculture, alleging that they had been unfairly denied USDA loans due to
racial discrimination during the period 1983 to 1997." The case was
entitled "Pigford v. Glickman" and in 1999, the black farmers won their
case. The government agreed to pay each of them as much as $50,000 to
settle their claims.
But then on February 23 of this year, something shocking happened in
relation to that original judgment. In total silence, the USDA agreed to
release more funds to "Pigford". The amount was a staggering $1.25 billion.
This was because the original number of plaintiffs - 400 black farmers - had
now swollen in a class action suit to include a total of 86,000 black
farmers throughout America.
There was only one teensy problem. The United States of America doesn't
have 86,000 black farmers. According to accurate and totally verified
census data, the total number of black farmers throughout America is only
39,697. Oops.
Well, gosh - how on earth did 39,697 explode into 86,000 claims? And how
did $50,000 explode into $1.25 billion? Well, folks, you'll just have to
ask the woman who not only spearheaded this case because of her position in
1997 at the "Rural Development Leadership Network" but whose family received
the highest single payout (approximately $13 million) from that action -
Shirley Sherrod.
<http://beforeitsnews.com/story/110/024/Is_There_More_to_Sherrods_Dismissal.
html> Oops again.
Yes, folks. It appears that Ms. Sherrod had just unwittingly exposed
herself as the perpetrator of one of the biggest fraud claims in the United
States - a fraud enabled solely because she screamed racism at the
government and cowed them into submission. And it gets even more
interesting. Ms. Sherrod has also exposed the person who aided and abetted
her in this race fraud. As it turns out, the original judgment of "Pigford
v. Glickman" in 1999 only applied to a total of 16,000 black farmers. But
in 2008, a junior Senator got a law passed to reopen the case and allow more
black farmers to sue for funds. The Senator was Barack Obama.
Because this law was passed in dead silence and because the woman
responsible for spearheading it was an obscure USDA official, American
taxpayers did not realize that they had just been forced in the midst of a
worldwide depression to pay out more than $1.25 billion to settle a race
claim.
But Breitbart knew. And last Monday, July 22, 2010, he cleverly laid a trap
which Sherrod - and Obama - stumbled headfirst into which has now resulted
in the entire world discovering the existence of this corrupt financial
judgment. Yes, folks - Breitbart is a genius.
As for Ms. Sherrod? Well, she's discovered too late that her cry of 'racism'
to the media which was intended to throw the spotlight on Breitbart has
instead thrown that spotlight on herself - and her corruption. Sherrod has
vanished from public view. Her 'pigs', it seems, have come home to roost.
Oink!
louis vuitton We offer replica handbags Sephora recorded excellent performances in Europe over the first half and continued to gain market share In the US bags women double anagramme designer chanel digit sales growth on a same store basis continuesLVMH continues to capitalize on its worldwide leadership position replica handbags the excellent geographical revenue balance the quality of its products and the creative and managerial talent of its teams to maintain progress in a growing worldwide marketOver the second half replica bags replica LVMH handbags will focus on
Reply to this